zh.md
Compare
Moto Pad 60 Pro vs Pad 5 Matte Display

Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro vs OPPO Pad 5 Matte Display

What Moto Pad 60 Pro does better (8) and where Pad 5 Matte Display wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2025Moto Pad 60 Pro

8.3Score

8 advantages≈ $300

OPPO · 2025Pad 5 Matte Display

8.4Score

7 advantages≈ $250

Higher score

7.2Display8.6

8.2Performance8.3

8.8Battery7.6

7.0Memory & storage7.0

5.8Features6.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

Moto Pad 60 ProPad 5 Matte Display

	Moto Pad 60 Pro	Pad 5 Matte Display	Difference
Height	291.8 mm	266 mm	+25.8 mm
Width	189.1 mm	192.8 mm	−3.7 mm
Thickness	6.9 mm	6.8 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	620 g	597 g	+23 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Moto Pad 60 Pro better than Pad 5 Matte Display?

Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Screen size12.7″ vs 12.1″+5%
Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
CPU frequency3.35 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+34%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
Resolution (long side)2,944 px vs 2,800 px+5%

Why is Pad 5 Matte Display better than Moto Pad 60 Pro?

Peak brightness400 nits vs 900 nits2.2×
Cellular (LTE)No · Moto Pad 60 Pro: Yes
5GNo · Moto Pad 60 Pro: Yes
Weight620 g vs 597 g+4%
Pixel density273 ppi vs 283 ppi+4%
Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 1,980 px+8%
Screen-to-body ratio84.8% vs 86.8%+2%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro≈ $3008.3	OPPO Pad 5 Matte Display≈ $2508.4
Design
Weight	620 g	597 g
Thickness	6.9 mm	6.8 mm
Height	291.8 mm	266 mm
Width	189.1 mm	192.8 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Aluminium	—
Ingress protection	IP52	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	—
Colours	Pantone: Bronze Green	Starlight Black, Aurora Pink
Display
Screen size	12.7″	12.1″
Panel	IPS LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	1,840 px	1,980 px
Resolution (long side)	2,944 px	2,800 px
Pixel density	273 ppi	283 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	400 nits	900 nits
Measured brightness	392 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	84.8%	86.8%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8300	Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.35 GHz	2.5 GHz
GPU	Mali G615-MC6	Mali-G615 MC2
AnTuTu score	1,564,600	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,370	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	10,200 mAh	10,050 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	—
Wired charging	45 W	33 W
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	Yes
5G	No	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	—
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass	Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), compass (cellular model only)
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	8 MP
Rear camera aperture	—	f/2
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Front camera	8 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	ColorOS 16
Major OS updates promised	2	—
EU label
Energy class	—	F
Battery charge cycles	—	1,200
Endurance per cycle	—	104 h
Repairability class	—	B
Drop resistance class	—	E

Related comparisons

Lenovo Idea Tab Plus 12.1vsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Pro

Lenovo IdeaTab ProvsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Pro

Xiaomi Pad 8vsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Pro 8.58.3

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1vsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Pro 8.48.3

Motorola Moto Pad 70 ProvsMotorola Moto Pad 60 Pro 8.88.3

Lenovo Idea Tab Plus 12.1vsOPPO Pad 5 Matte Display