zh.md
Compare
Moto Pad 60 Pro vs Poco Pad M1

Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1

What Moto Pad 60 Pro does better (15) and where Poco Pad M1 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2025Moto Pad 60 Pro

8.3Score

15 advantages≈ $300

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2025Poco Pad M1

7.8Score

5 advantages

7.2Display7.6

8.2Performance5.7

8.8Battery9.1

7.0Memory & storage7.6

5.8Features5.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Moto Pad 60 ProPoco Pad M1

	Moto Pad 60 Pro	Poco Pad M1	Difference
Height	291.8 mm	279.8 mm	+12 mm
Width	189.1 mm	181.7 mm	+7.4 mm
Thickness	6.9 mm	7.5 mm	−0.6 mm
Weight	620 g	610 g	+10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Moto Pad 60 Pro better than Poco Pad M1?

Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,370 vs 1,2443.5×
AnTuTu score1,564,600 vs 817,549+91%
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Screen size12.7″ vs 12.1″+5%
Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
CPU frequency3.35 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+24%
GPSYes · Poco Pad M1: No
Pixel density273 ppi vs 249 ppi+10%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
USB version3.2 vs 2+60%

Why is Poco Pad M1 better than Moto Pad 60 Pro?

Battery capacity10,200 mAh vs 12,000 mAh+18%
Peak brightness400 nits vs 600 nits+50%
Measured brightness392 nits vs 581 nits+48%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Moto Pad 60 Pro: Yes

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro≈ $3008.3	Xiaomi Poco Pad M17.8
Design
Weight	620 g	610 g
Thickness	6.9 mm	7.5 mm
Height	291.8 mm	279.8 mm
Width	189.1 mm	181.7 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP52	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	—
Colours	Pantone: Bronze Green	Gray, Blue
Display
Screen size	12.7″	12.1″
Panel	IPS LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	1,840 px	1,600 px
Resolution (long side)	2,944 px	2,560 px
Pixel density	273 ppi	249 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	400 nits	600 nits
Measured brightness	392 nits	581 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	84.8%	83.5%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8300	Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.35 GHz	2.7 GHz
GPU	Mali G615-MC6	Adreno 810
AnTuTu score	1,564,600	817,549
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,370	1,244
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	1,103
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	10,200 mAh	12,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	14.8 h
Wired charging	45 W	33 W
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	No
5G	No	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	—
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.5 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	8 MP
Rear camera aperture	—	f/2
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Front camera	8 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised	2	—
EU label
Energy class	—	G
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	103 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A