vs
8.6Display6.1
8.3Performance5.0
7.6Battery7.1
7.0Memory & storage7.6
6.6Features4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pad 5 Matte DisplayBlack Shark Pad 7 Pro
| Pad 5 Matte Display | Black Shark Pad 7 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 266 mm | 254.6 mm | +11.4 mm |
| Width | 192.8 mm | 166.1 mm | +26.7 mm |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 7.4 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 597 g | 513 g | +84 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pad 5 Matte Display better than Black Shark Pad 7 Pro?
- Peak brightness900 nits vs 420 nits2.1×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- 5GYes · Black Shark Pad 7 Pro: No
- Battery capacity10,050 mAh vs 8,800 mAh+14%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
- Screen size12.1″ vs 11″+10%
- Pixel density283 ppi vs 204 ppi+39%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
- Resolution (short side)1,980 px vs 1,200 px+65%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Resolution (long side)2,800 px vs 1,900 px+47%
- Thickness6.8 mm vs 7.4 mm+9%
Why is Black Shark Pad 7 Pro better than Pad 5 Matte Display?
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight597 g vs 513 g+16%
- Rear camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 597 g | 513 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 266 mm | 254.6 mm |
| Width | 192.8 mm | 166.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Colours | Starlight Black, Aurora Pink | Gray, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12.1″ | 11″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,980 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,800 px | 1,900 px |
| Pixel density | 283 ppi | 204 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 420 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 83% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra | Mediatek Helio G100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 570,469 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,971 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,050 mAh | 8,800 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), compass (cellular model only) | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/2 | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | HyperOS 2.0 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | F | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 104 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | E | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus 12.1vsOPPO Pad 5 Matte Display
vs
Lenovo Tab K11 G2vsOPPO Pad 5 Matte Display
vs
Xiaomi Pad 8vsOPPO Pad 5 Matte Display
8.58.4
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1vsOPPO Pad 5 Matte Display
8.48.4
vs
Lenovo IdeaTab 2025vsXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
vs
Lenovo Tab K11 G2vsXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro