How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
630 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Pad Mini vs RedMagic Astra

OPPO Pad Mini vs ZTE RedMagic Astra

What Pad Mini does better (10) and where RedMagic Astra wins (9) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Pad Mini
OPPO · 2026Pad Mini
8.9Score
10 advantages≈ $500
vs
ZTE RedMagic Astra
ZTE · 2025RedMagic Astra
9.0Score
9 advantages≈ $540
Higher score
9.3Display9.4
9.3Performance9.2
7.0Battery6.7
8.7Memory & storage9.6
7.6Features8.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pad MiniRedMagic Astra
132.4 × 194.45.4134.2 × 2076.9
Pad MiniRedMagic AstraDifference
Height194.4 mm207 mm−12.6 mm
Width132.4 mm134.2 mm−1.8 mm
Thickness5.4 mm6.9 mm−1.5 mm
Weight279 g370 g−91 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pad Mini better than RedMagic Astra?

  1. AnTuTu score3,337,900 vs 2,603,900+28%
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,780 vs 8,142+20%
  3. Weight279 g vs 370 g+33%
  4. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
  5. Pixel density344 ppi vs 313 ppi+10%
  6. Thickness5.4 mm vs 6.9 mm+28%
  7. Resolution (short side)1,680 px vs 1,504 px+12%
  8. Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
  9. Resolution (long side)2,520 px vs 2,400 px+5%
  10. Screen-to-body ratio89.6% vs 85.8%+4%

Why is RedMagic Astra better than Pad Mini?

  1. RAM12 GB vs 24 GB2×
  2. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  3. Battery capacity8,000 mAh vs 8,200 mAh+2%
  4. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 165 Hz+15%
  5. Screen size8.8″ vs 9.1″+3%
  6. Wired charging67 W vs 80 W+19%
  7. CPU frequency3.8 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+14%
  8. Front camera8 MP vs 9 MP+12%
  9. Charged in 30 min62% vs 68%+10%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Pad MiniOPPO Pad Mini≈ $5008.9
Design
Weight279 g370 g
Thickness5.4 mm6.9 mm
Height194.4 mm207 mm
Width132.4 mm134.2 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Aluminium
Ingress protection—IP54
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version)
ColoursMonet Purple, Space Gray, Mint GreenEclipse Black, Starfrost Silver
Display
Screen size8.8″9.1″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO OLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive refresh)—Yes
Resolution (short side)1,680 px1,504 px
Resolution (long side)2,520 px2,400 px
Pixel density344 ppi313 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz165 Hz
Peak brightness1,600 nits1,600 nits
Measured brightness—1,036 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.6%85.8%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.8 GHz4.32 GHz
GPUAdreno 829Adreno 830
AnTuTu score3,337,9002,603,900
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,7808,142
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,699
Memory
RAM12 GB24 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity8,000 mAh8,200 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Active use (test)—11.2 h
Wired charging67 W80 W
Charged in 30 min62%68%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
5GNo—
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth65.4
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2
USB version3.23.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)Yes—
NFCNoNo
GPSNoNo
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-27.3 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Fingerprint sensor—Side / power button
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP13 MP
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps30 fps
Front camera8 MP9 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 16—
EU label
Energy class—G
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—67 h
Repairability class—B
Drop resistance class—E
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare