How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Pad Mini vs RedMagic Astra 2

OPPO Pad Mini vs ZTE RedMagic Astra 2

What Pad Mini does better (6) and where RedMagic Astra 2 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Pad Mini
OPPO · 2026Pad Mini
8.8Score
6 advantages≈ $500
vs
ZTE RedMagic Astra 2
ZTE · 2026RedMagic Astra 2
9.2Score
8 advantages≈ $630
Higher score
9.3Display9.3
9.2Performance9.7
7.0Battery6.6
8.7Memory & storage9.4
8.2Features8.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pad MiniRedMagic Astra 2
132.4 × 194.45.4134.2 × 207.16.9
Pad MiniRedMagic Astra 2Difference
Height194.4 mm207.1 mm−12.7 mm
Width132.4 mm134.2 mm−1.8 mm
Thickness5.4 mm6.9 mm−1.5 mm
Weight279 g363 g−84 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pad Mini better than RedMagic Astra 2?

  1. Weight279 g vs 363 g+30%
  2. Pixel density344 ppi vs 313 ppi+10%
  3. Thickness5.4 mm vs 6.9 mm+28%
  4. Resolution (short side)1,680 px vs 1,504 px+12%
  5. Resolution (long side)2,520 px vs 2,400 px+5%
  6. Screen-to-body ratio89.6% vs 85.7%+5%

Why is RedMagic Astra 2 better than Pad Mini?

  1. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  2. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  3. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 185 Hz+28%
  4. Battery capacity8,000 mAh vs 8,300 mAh+4%
  5. Screen size8.8″ vs 9.1″+3%
  6. CPU frequency3.8 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+21%
  7. Wired charging67 W vs 75 W+12%
  8. Front camera8 MP vs 9 MP+12%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Pad MiniOPPO Pad Mini≈ $5008.8
Design
Weight279 g363 g
Thickness5.4 mm6.9 mm
Height194.4 mm207.1 mm
Width132.4 mm134.2 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Aluminium
Ingress protection—IP54
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 3
ColoursMonet Purple, Space Gray, Mint GreenEclipse Black, Starfrost Silver
Display
Screen size8.8″9.1″
PanelAMOLEDOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (short side)1,680 px1,504 px
Resolution (long side)2,520 px2,400 px
Pixel density344 ppi313 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz185 Hz
Peak brightness1,600 nits1,600 nits
Measured brightness—983 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.6%85.7%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.8 GHz4.6 GHz
GPUAdreno 829Adreno 840
AnTuTu score—3,565,930
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—11,323
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—7,838
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity8,000 mAh8,300 mAh
Active use (test)—10.4 h
Wired charging67 W75 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—6
USBUSB Type-C 3.2Dual USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2 & USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.23.2
NFCNoNo
GPSNoNo
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.8 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Fingerprint sensor—Side / power button
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP13 MP
Rear camera aperture—f/2.2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps30 fps
Front camera8 MP9 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 16—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare