How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Pad SE vs Poco Pad M1

OPPO Pad SE vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1

What Pad SE does better (3) and where Poco Pad M1 wins (15) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Pad SE
OPPO · 2025Pad SE
6.7Score
3 advantages≈ $120
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
Xiaomi · 2025Poco Pad M1
7.8Score
15 advantages
Higher score
6.2Display7.6
6.6Performance5.7
7.3Battery9.1
5.6Memory & storage7.6
3.3Features5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pad SEPoco Pad M1
166.5 × 254.97.4181.7 × 279.87.5
Pad SEPoco Pad M1Difference
Height254.9 mm279.8 mm−24.9 mm
Width166.5 mm181.7 mm−15.2 mm
Thickness7.4 mm7.5 mm−0.1 mm
Weight527 g610 g−83 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pad SE better than Poco Pad M1?

  1. Cellular (LTE)Yes · Poco Pad M1: No
  2. GPSYes · Poco Pad M1: No
  3. Weight527 g vs 610 g+16%

Why is Poco Pad M1 better than Pad SE?

  1. Battery capacity9,340 mAh vs 12,000 mAh+28%
  2. Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
  3. Screen size11″ vs 12.1″+10%
  4. CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+23%
  5. Pixel density206 ppi vs 249 ppi+21%
  6. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  7. Memory card slotNo · Pad SE: Yes
  8. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Pad SE: Yes
  9. Peak brightness500 nits vs 600 nits+20%
  10. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
  11. Rear camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
  12. Front camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Pad SEOPPO Pad SE≈ $1206.7
Design
Weight527 g610 g
Thickness7.4 mm7.5 mm
Height254.9 mm279.8 mm
Width166.5 mm181.7 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackAluminiumAluminium
ColoursTwilight Blue, Starlight SilverGray, Blue
Display
Screen size11″12.1″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,200 px1,600 px
Resolution (long side)1,920 px2,560 px
Pixel density206 ppi249 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness500 nits600 nits
Measured brightness—581 nits
Screen-to-body ratio82.7%83.5%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G100Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process6 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.2 GHz2.7 GHz
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 810
AnTuTu score—817,549
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—1,244
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,103
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity9,340 mAh12,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—14.8 h
Wired charging33 W33 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.4
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
NFCNoNo
GPSYesNo
Satellite navigationGLONASS—
Features
Stylus supportYesYes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.5 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity (accessories only), compass (LTE model only)Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera5 MP8 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2.2f/2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Front camera5 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 15HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class—G
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—103 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare