Why is Pad 15 better than ET65?
- Weight449 g vs 1,074 g2.4×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · ET65: No
- Screen size10.4″ vs 10.1″+3%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Why is ET65 better than Pad 15?
- eSIMNo · Pad 15: Yes
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 449 g | 1,074 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | — |
| Height | 246.5 mm | 18 mm |
| Width | 156.3 mm | — |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Green, Gray | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.4″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,000 px | — |
| Pixel density | 225 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 79.3% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 1.6 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,280 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 10 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | — |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Front camera | 16 MP | — |
| 4K front-camera video | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
