How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Pad 16 vs Terra Pad 1201

OSCAL Pad 16 vs Wortmann Terra Pad 1201

What Pad 16 does better (2) and where Terra Pad 1201 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

OSCAL Pad 16
OSCAL · 2024Pad 16
6.4Score
2 advantages
Higher score
vs
Wortmann Terra Pad 1201
Wortmann · 2024Terra Pad 1201
2 advantages≈ $360
7.6Memory & storage8.0

Why is Pad 16 better than Terra Pad 1201?

  1. Cellular (LTE)Yes · Terra Pad 1201: No
  2. Weight515 g vs 550 g+7%

Why is Terra Pad 1201 better than Pad 16?

  1. Screen size10.5″ vs 12.6″+20%
  2. Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight515 g550 g
Thickness7.4 mm—
Height246.6 mm7 mm
Width160.8 mm—
Ingress protection—IP42
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx2
ColoursSpace Gray, Sierra Blue—
Display
Screen size10.5″12.6″
PanelIPS LCD—
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,200 px—
Resolution (long side)1,920 px—
Pixel density216 ppi—
Refresh rate60 Hz—
Screen-to-body ratio80.6%—
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606MediaTek
Chip makerUnisocMediaTek
Process12 nm—
CPU cores8—
CPU frequency1.6 GHz—
GPUMali-G57 MP1—
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Memory card slotYes—
Battery
Battery capacity8,200 mAh—
Wireless chargingNo—
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
5GNo—
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5—
Bluetooth55.2
USBUSB Type-C—
NFCNo—
GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS—
Features
Stylus supportYes—
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5 mm headphone jackNo—
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity (accessories only)—
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Max video1080p—
Front camera13 MP—
4K front-camera videoNo—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13—
PlatformAndroid—
EU label
Energy class—E
Battery charge cycles—800
Endurance per cycle—118 h
Repairability class—B
Drop resistance class—E
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare