How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Pad 18 vs ET65

OSCAL Pad 18 vs Zebra ET65

What Pad 18 does better (6) and where ET65 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

OSCAL Pad 18
OSCAL · 2023Pad 18
7.1Score
6 advantages
Higher score
vs
Zebra ET65
Zebra · 2023ET65
6.5Score
2 advantages≈ $2,250
4.6Display6.8
8.5Memory & storage4.9

Why is Pad 18 better than ET65?

  1. Weight490 g vs 1,074 g2.2×
  2. RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
  3. Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  4. Cellular (LTE)Yes · ET65: No
  5. Screen size11″ vs 10.1″+8%
  6. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×

Why is ET65 better than Pad 18?

  1. eSIMNo · Pad 18: Yes
  2. Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Zebra ET65Zebra ET65≈ $2,2506.5
Design
Weight490 g1,074 g
Thickness7.4 mm—
Height256.8 mm18 mm
Width168.3 mm—
Glass protection—Gorilla Glass
ColoursBlue—
Display
Screen size11″10.1″
PanelIPS LCD—
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,200 px—
Resolution (long side)1,920 px—
Pixel density207 ppi—
Refresh rate60 Hz—
Peak brightness—1,000 nits
Screen-to-body ratio80.4%—
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T616Qualcomm Snapdragon
Chip makerUnisocQualcomm
Process12 nm—
CPU cores8—
CPU frequency2 GHz—
GPUMali-G57 MP1—
Memory
RAM12 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB128 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeeMMC 5.1—
Memory card slotYes—
Battery
Battery capacity8,800 mAh—
Wired charging18 W—
Wireless chargingNo—
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
5GNo—
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5—
Bluetooth55.2
USBUSB Type-C—
NFCNo—
GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS—
Features
Stylus supportYes—
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5 mm headphone jackNo—
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity (accessories only)—
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP—
Rear cameras2—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Max video1080p—
Front camera13 MP—
4K front-camera videoNo—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13—
PlatformAndroid—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare