vs
3.0Display3.5
2.6Memory & storage2.6
Why is Pad 60 better than PET 10182-LH464E?
- Weight537 g vs 562 g+5%
Why is PET 10182-LH464E better than Pad 60?
- RAM3 GB vs 4 GB+33%
- Bluetooth4.1 vs 5.3+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 537 g | 562 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | — |
| Height | 246.5 mm | 14 mm |
| Width | 163 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Misty Blue, Meteorite Grey | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,280 px | — |
| Pixel density | 149 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.6% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | MediaTek Helio |
| Chip maker | — | MediaTek |
| CPU cores | 4 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,580 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 10 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | No | — |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | — |
| Bluetooth | 4.1 | 5.3 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| GPS | No | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | — |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 5 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Front camera | 2 MP | — |
| 4K front-camera video | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | E |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 67 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | E |
