vs
3.6Display3.0
3.8Performance4.3
3.6Battery3.8
4.1Memory & storage4.6
5.8Features6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
RT3 ProTab A10 Pro
| RT3 Pro | Tab A10 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 207 mm | 237.7 mm | −30.7 mm |
| Width | 134 mm | 156.5 mm | −22.5 mm |
| Thickness | 13.9 mm | 7.8 mm | +6.1 mm |
| Weight | 538 g | 446 g | +92 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is RT3 Pro better than Tab A10 Pro?
- Pixel density189 ppi vs 149 ppi+27%
- Endurance per cycle139 h vs 67 h2.1×
- Energy classB vs F
- Drop resistance classA vs D
- Front camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
- Rear camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
Why is Tab A10 Pro better than RT3 Pro?
- Battery capacity5,150 mAh vs 6,600 mAh+28%
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- Wired charging10 W vs 18 W+80%
- Screen size8″ vs 10.1″+26%
- Weight538 g vs 446 g+21%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · RT3 Pro: Yes
- Thickness13.9 mm vs 7.8 mm+78%
- Screen-to-body ratio66.9% vs 79.5%+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 538 g | 446 g |
| Thickness | 13.9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 207 mm | 237.7 mm |
| Width | 134 mm | 156.5 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Black, Orange, Green | Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,280 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 149 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 66.9% | 79.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 | Mediatek MT8786 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,150 mAh | 6,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, compass | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/2 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | F |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 139 h | 67 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | A | D |
Related comparisons
vs
Peaq PET 11080-F428EvsOukitel RT3 Pro
5.15.0
vs
Tecno MegapadvsOukitel RT3 Pro
5.25.0
vs
TCL Tab 10 NxtPapervsOukitel RT3 Pro
5.35.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024)vsUleFone Tab A10 Pro
5.05.0
vs
Peaq PET 11080-F428EvsUleFone Tab A10 Pro
5.15.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7vsUleFone Tab A10 Pro
4.95.0