vs
3.5Display4.4
2.6Memory & storage4.4
Why is PET 10182-LH464E better than T50?
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 350 nits+14%
Why is T50 better than PET 10182-LH464E?
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size10.1″ vs 11″+9%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Energy classE vs D
- Drop resistance classE vs B
- Endurance per cycle67 h vs 126 h+88%
- Weight562 g vs 498 g+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 562 g | 498 g |
| Height | 14 mm | 9 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx4 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 11″ |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 350 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 67 h | 126 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | B |
