How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. PET 10182-LH464E vs Blade X1001

Peaq PET 10182-LH464E vs ZTE Blade X1001

What PET 10182-LH464E does better (1) and where Blade X1001 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Peaq PET 10182-LH464E
Peaq · 2025PET 10182-LH464E
4.0Score
1 advantage≈ $110
vs
ZTE Blade X1001
ZTE · 2026Blade X1001
4.2Score
4 advantages≈ $120
Higher score
3.5Display3.0
2.6Memory & storage3.1

Why is PET 10182-LH464E better than Blade X1001?

  1. Repairability classB vs C

Why is Blade X1001 better than PET 10182-LH464E?

  1. Cellular (LTE)No · PET 10182-LH464E: Yes
  2. Energy classE vs D
  3. Endurance per cycle67 h vs 96 h+43%
  4. Battery charge cycles800 vs 1,000+25%
Specifications

Side by side

ZTE Blade X1001ZTE Blade X1001≈ $1204.2
Design
Weight562 g—
Thickness—8 mm
Height14 mm238.4 mm
Width—148.4 mm
Ingress protectionIP42—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2—
Colours—Gray
Display
Screen size10.1″10.1″
Panel—IPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)—800 px
Resolution (long side)—1,280 px
Pixel density—149 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Peak brightness400 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio—83.6%
Performance
ChipsetMediaTek HelioUnisoc T606
Chip makerMediaTekUnisoc
Process—12 nm
CPU cores—8
CPU frequency—1.6 GHz
GPU—Mali-G57 MP1
Memory
RAM4 GB4 GB
Storage (max)64 GB64 GB
Storage (base)64 GB64 GB
Memory card slot—Yes
Battery
Battery capacity—6,000 mAh
Wired charging—10 W
Wireless charging—No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoYes
5G—No
eSIM—No
Dual SIM—Yes
Wi-Fi standard—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.35.2
USB—USB Type-C
NFC—No
GPS—Yes
Features
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack—Yes
Sensors—Accelerometer
Cameras
Rear camera—5 MP
Rear cameras—1
Ultra-wide camera—No
Optical stabilisation—No
Front camera—2 MP
4K front-camera video—No
Software
OS at launch—Android 14
Platform—Android
EU label
Energy classED
Battery charge cycles8001,000
Endurance per cycle67 h96 h
Repairability classBC
Drop resistance classEE
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare