How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. PET 11080-F428E vs Megapad

Peaq PET 11080-F428E vs Tecno Megapad

What PET 11080-F428E does better (1) and where Megapad wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Peaq PET 11080-F428E
Peaq · 2024PET 11080-F428E
5.1Score
1 advantage≈ $150
vs
Tecno Megapad
Tecno · 2024Megapad
5.2Score
4 advantages
Higher score
5.4Display3.3
3.7Memory & storage4.9

Why is PET 11080-F428E better than Megapad?

  1. Screen size11″ vs 10.1″+8%

Why is Megapad better than PET 11080-F428E?

  1. Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  2. Cellular (LTE)No · PET 11080-F428E: Yes
  3. Weight784 g vs 447 g+75%
  4. Peak brightness420 nits vs 450 nits+7%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight784 g447 g
Thickness—7.4 mm
Height16 mm240.7 mm
Width—159.5 mm
Ingress protectionIP42—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2—
Colours—Champagne Gold, Space Grey
Display
Screen size11″10.1″
Panel—IPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)—800 px
Resolution (long side)—1,280 px
Pixel density—149 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Peak brightness420 nits450 nits
Screen-to-body ratio—77%
Performance
ChipsetMediaTek HelioMediatek Helio G80
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process—12 nm
CPU cores—8
CPU frequency—2 GHz
GPU—Mali-G52 MC2
Memory
RAM4 GB4 GB
Storage (max)128 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Memory card slot—Yes
Battery
Battery capacity—7,000 mAh
Wired charging—18 W
Wireless charging—No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoYes
eSIM—No
Dual SIM—No
Wi-Fi standard—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth55.1
USB—USB Type-C
NFC—No
GPS—Yes
Features
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack—Yes
Sensors—Accelerometer
Cameras
Rear camera—13 MP
Rear cameras—1
Ultra-wide camera—No
Optical stabilisation—No
Max video—1080p
Front camera—5 MP
4K front-camera video—No
Software
OS at launch—Android 14
Platform—Android
EU label
Energy classE—
Battery charge cycles800—
Endurance per cycle91 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classE—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare