zh.md
Compare
Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro vs Poco Pad M1

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1

What Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro does better (12) and where Poco Pad M1 wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2025Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro

8.0Score

12 advantages≈ $970

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2025Poco Pad M1

7.8Score

11 advantages

6.3Display7.6

7.8Performance5.7

8.8Battery9.1

6.1Memory & storage7.6

9.5Features5.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab Active5 ProPoco Pad M1

	Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro	Poco Pad M1	Difference
Height	242.9 mm	279.8 mm	−36.9 mm
Width	170.2 mm	181.7 mm	−11.5 mm
Thickness	10.2 mm	7.5 mm	+2.7 mm
Weight	680 g	610 g	+70 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro better than Poco Pad M1?

Cellular (LTE)Yes · Poco Pad M1: No
5GYes · Poco Pad M1: No
eSIMYes · Poco Pad M1: No
GPSYes · Poco Pad M1: No
Max video4K vs 1080p
Energy classE vs G
Battery charge cycles2,000 vs 1,0002×
Repairability classB vs C
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
Rear camera12 MP vs 8 MP+50%
Endurance per cycle143 h vs 103 h+38%

Why is Poco Pad M1 better than Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro?

Battery capacity10,100 mAh vs 12,000 mAh+19%
Screen size10.1″ vs 12.1″+20%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Drop resistance classE vs A
Weight680 g vs 610 g+11%
Pixel density224 ppi vs 249 ppi+11%
CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+8%
Thickness10.2 mm vs 7.5 mm+36%
Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 1,600 px+33%
Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 2,560 px+33%
Screen-to-body ratio71.5% vs 83.5%+17%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro≈ $9708.0	Xiaomi Poco Pad M17.8
Design
Weight	680 g	610 g
Thickness	10.2 mm	7.5 mm
Height	242.9 mm	279.8 mm
Width	170.2 mm	181.7 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+	—
Colours	Green	Gray, Blue
Display
Screen size	10.1″	12.1″
Panel	TFT LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	1,200 px	1,600 px
Resolution (long side)	1,920 px	2,560 px
Pixel density	224 ppi	249 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	600 nits
Measured brightness	—	581 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	71.5%	83.5%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3	Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	2.7 GHz
GPU	Adreno 810	Adreno 810
AnTuTu score	—	817,549
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	1,244
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	1,103
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	10,100 mAh	12,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	14.8 h
Wired charging	—	33 W
Wireless charging	—	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
NFC	Yes	No
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.5 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	Yes
Fingerprint sensor	Front / Home button	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only)	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera	12 MP	8 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/2
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Front camera	8 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 7	HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class	E	G
Battery charge cycles	2,000	1,000
Endurance per cycle	143 h	103 h
Repairability class	B	C
Drop resistance class	E	A