zh.md
Compare
Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ vs Poco Pad M1

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1

What Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ does better (22) and where Poco Pad M1 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2025Galaxy Tab S10 FE+

8.4Score

22 advantages≈ $530

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2025Poco Pad M1

7.8Score

7 advantages

8.1Display7.6

7.9Performance5.7

8.0Battery9.1

7.0Memory & storage7.6

8.6Features5.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab S10 FE+Poco Pad M1

	Galaxy Tab S10 FE+	Poco Pad M1	Difference
Height	300.6 mm	279.8 mm	+20.8 mm
Width	194.7 mm	181.7 mm	+13 mm
Thickness	6 mm	7.5 mm	−1.5 mm
Weight	664 g	610 g	+54 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ better than Poco Pad M1?

Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,860 vs 1,2443.1×
AnTuTu score1,264,130 vs 817,549+55%
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Cellular (LTE)Yes · Poco Pad M1: No
5GYes · Poco Pad M1: No
Screen size13.1″ vs 12.1″+8%
Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
Peak brightness800 nits vs 600 nits+33%
Measured brightness748 nits vs 581 nits+29%
eSIMYes · Poco Pad M1: No
GPSYes · Poco Pad M1: No
Max video4K vs 1080p

Why is Poco Pad M1 better than Galaxy Tab S10 FE+?

Battery capacity10,090 mAh vs 12,000 mAh+19%
Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy Tab S10 FE+: Yes
Drop resistance classE vs A
Weight664 g vs 610 g+9%
Endurance per cycle99 h vs 103 h+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+≈ $5308.4	Xiaomi Poco Pad M17.8
Design
Weight	664 g	610 g
Thickness	6 mm	7.5 mm
Height	300.6 mm	279.8 mm
Width	194.7 mm	181.7 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Colours	Silver, Gray, Blue	Gray, Blue
Display
Screen size	13.1″	12.1″
Panel	IPS LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	1,800 px	1,600 px
Resolution (long side)	2,880 px	2,560 px
Pixel density	259 ppi	249 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	800 nits	600 nits
Measured brightness	748 nits	581 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	85%	83.5%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 1580	Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Chip maker	Exynos	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.9 GHz	2.7 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 540	Adreno 810
AnTuTu score	1,264,130	817,549
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,860	1,244
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	1,103
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	10,090 mAh	12,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	14.8 h
Wired charging	45 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	41%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.5 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only)	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	8 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/2	f/2
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Front camera	12 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	Yes	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 8.5	HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class	F	G
Battery charge cycles	2,000	1,000
Endurance per cycle	99 h	103 h
Repairability class	C	C
Drop resistance class	E	A