zh.md
Compare
Galaxy Tab S12 Ultra vs iQOO Pad Ultra

Samsung Galaxy Tab S12 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO Pad Ultra

What Galaxy Tab S12 Ultra does better (13) and where iQOO Pad Ultra wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2026Galaxy Tab S12 Ultra

9.6Score

13 advantages≈ $1,600

Higher score

Vivo · 2026iQOO Pad Ultra

9.4Score

9 advantages≈ $930

9.6Display9.2

9.3Performance9.8

8.6Battery7.9

9.7Memory & storage9.4

9.6Features7.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab S12 UltraiQOO Pad Ultra

	Galaxy Tab S12 Ultra	iQOO Pad Ultra	Difference
Height	326.3 mm	197.4 mm	+128.9 mm
Width	208.5 mm	126.3 mm	+82.2 mm
Thickness	5.1 mm	5.7 mm	−0.6 mm
Weight	692 g	298 g	+394 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab S12 Ultra better than iQOO Pad Ultra?

Screen size14.6″ vs 8.8″+66%
Battery capacity11,600 mAh vs 9,020 mAh+29%
Cellular (LTE)Yes · iQOO Pad Ultra: No
5GYes · iQOO Pad Ultra: No
Memory card slotYes · iQOO Pad Ultra: No
eSIMYes · iQOO Pad Ultra: No
GPSYes · iQOO Pad Ultra: No
Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO Pad Ultra: No
Front camera12 MP vs 8 MP+50%
Resolution (long side)2,960 px vs 2,304 px+28%
Resolution (short side)1,848 px vs 1,440 px+28%
Thickness5.1 mm vs 5.7 mm+12%

Why is iQOO Pad Ultra better than Galaxy Tab S12 Ultra?

AnTuTu score2,701,483 vs 4,518,403+67%
Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 4,500 nits2.8×
Weight692 g vs 298 g2.3×
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,403 vs 11,703+24%
Wired charging45 W vs 66 W+47%
Pixel density239 ppi vs 309 ppi+29%
CPU frequency4.21 GHz vs 5.01 GHz+19%
Process3 nm vs 2 nm+50%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Tab S12 Ultra≈ $1,6009.6	Vivo iQOO Pad Ultra≈ $9309.4
Design
Weight	692 g	298 g
Thickness	5.1 mm	5.7 mm
Height	326.3 mm	197.4 mm
Width	208.5 mm	126.3 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Colours	Gray, Silver	Black, Silver
Display
Screen size	14.6″	8.8″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (short side)	1,848 px	1,440 px
Resolution (long side)	2,960 px	2,304 px
Pixel density	239 ppi	309 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	165 Hz
Peak brightness	1,600 nits	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	1,031 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	90.8%	90.1%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	MediaTek Dimensity 9500	Qualcomm SM8975 Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	3 nm	2 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	4.21 GHz	5.01 GHz
GPU	Mali-G1 Ultra MC12	Adreno 850
AnTuTu score	2,701,483	4,518,403
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	9,403	11,703
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	6,948	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	11,600 mAh	9,020 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Si/C
Active use (test)	13.4 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	66 W
Charged in 30 min	39%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	6	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2
USB version	3.2	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	—
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-21.2 LUFS	—
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	13 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/2	—
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Front camera	12 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	Yes	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 17	Android 17
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 9	OriginOS 7 HD
Major OS updates promised	7	—
EU label
Energy class	G	—
Battery charge cycles	1,200	—
Endurance per cycle	88 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	E	—