vs
8.3Display7.8
9.2Memory & storage6.1
Why is Galaxy Tab S12 better than Redmi Pad Pro?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
- Screen size12.6″ vs 12.1″+4%
- Peak brightness650 nits vs 600 nits+8%
- Pixel density266 ppi vs 249 ppi+7%
- Weight555 g vs 571 g+3%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.2+15%
Why is Redmi Pad Pro better than Galaxy Tab S12?
Redmi Pad Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 555 g | 571 g |
| Thickness | — | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 6 mm | 280 mm |
| Width | — | 181.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | — | Dark Gray, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12.6″ | 12.1″ |
| Panel | — | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 1,600 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 2,560 px |
| Pixel density | 266 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 650 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 654 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 83.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | — | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 589,889 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,840 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 786 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 10,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 9.6 h |
| Wired charging | — | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 28% |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | — | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.2 |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | — | No |
| GPS | — | No |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | — | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.1 LUFS |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | — | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Front camera | — | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 14 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 80 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | E | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S12vsLenovo Legion Tab G5
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S12vsRedmagic Astra 2 Gaming
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S12vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S11
9.28.9
vs
Apple iPad (2025)vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S12
6.69.2
vs
Lenovo IdeaTab 2025vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S12
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S12vsLenovo Idea Tab Plus 12.1