zh.md
Compare
Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ vs Pad 6S Pro 12.4

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ vs Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4

What Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ does better (7) and where Pad 6S Pro 12.4 wins (21) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab S9 FE+

8.0Score

7 advantages≈ $830

Xiaomi · 2024Pad 6S Pro 12.4

9.0Score

21 advantages≈ $760

Higher score

7.9Display9.1

6.2Performance8.5

8.4Battery7.8

7.0Memory & storage9.4

7.6Features8.2

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab S9 FE+Pad 6S Pro 12.4

	Galaxy Tab S9 FE+	Pad 6S Pro 12.4	Difference
Height	285.4 mm	278.7 mm	+6.7 mm
Width	185.4 mm	191.6 mm	−6.2 mm
Thickness	6.5 mm	6.3 mm	+0.2 mm
Weight	627 g	590 g	+37 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ better than Pad 6S Pro 12.4?

Cellular (LTE)Yes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No
5GYes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No
Major OS updates promised4 vs 3+33%
Memory card slotYes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No
eSIMYes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No
GPSYes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No

Why is Pad 6S Pro 12.4 better than Galaxy Tab S9 FE+?

AnTuTu score765,195 vs 1,539,7622×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,859 vs 5,268+84%
Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
Wired charging45 W vs 120 W2.7×
Refresh rate90 Hz vs 144 Hz+60%
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
Charged in 30 min38% vs 135%3.6×
Rear camera8 MP vs 50 MP6.2×
Front camera12 MP vs 32 MP2.7×
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+33%
Pixel density243 ppi vs 295 ppi+21%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+≈ $8308.0	Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4≈ $7609.0
Design
Weight	627 g	590 g
Thickness	6.5 mm	6.3 mm
Height	285.4 mm	278.7 mm
Width	185.4 mm	191.6 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 3	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Mint, Silver, Gray, Lavender	Black, Blue, Green
Display
Screen size	12.4″	12.4″
Panel	IPS LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	1,600 px	2,032 px
Resolution (long side)	2,560 px	3,048 px
Pixel density	243 ppi	295 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	800 nits	900 nits
Measured brightness	760 nits	848 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	84.3%	85.7%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 1380	Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip maker	Exynos	Qualcomm
Process	5 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Mali-G68 MP5	Adreno 740
AnTuTu score	765,195	1,539,762
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,859	5,268
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	2,970
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,090 mAh	10,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.2 h
Wired charging	45 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	38%	135%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	—	Yes
NFC	No	Yes
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-20.5 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	Side / power button
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only)	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera	8 MP	50 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/2	f/1.8
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Front camera	12 MP	32 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 6	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	4	3