zh.md
Compare
Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ vs Redmi Pad 2

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2

What Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ does better (18) and where Redmi Pad 2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab S9 FE+

8.0Score

18 advantages≈ $830

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2025Redmi Pad 2

6.7Score

3 advantages≈ $250

7.9Display7.2

6.2Performance5.1

8.4Battery6.5

7.0Memory & storage6.1

7.6Features4.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab S9 FE+Redmi Pad 2

	Galaxy Tab S9 FE+	Redmi Pad 2	Difference
Height	285.4 mm	254.6 mm	+30.8 mm
Width	185.4 mm	166 mm	+19.4 mm
Thickness	6.5 mm	7.4 mm	−0.9 mm
Weight	627 g	510 g	+117 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ better than Redmi Pad 2?

Wired charging45 W vs 18 W2.5×
AnTuTu score765,195 vs 570,469+34%
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
5GYes · Redmi Pad 2: No
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,859 vs 1,980+44%
Battery capacity10,090 mAh vs 9,000 mAh+12%
Screen size12.4″ vs 11″+13%
Measured brightness760 nits vs 527 nits+44%
Front camera12 MP vs 5 MP2.4×
Peak brightness800 nits vs 600 nits+33%
Charged in 30 min38% vs 17%2.2×
eSIMYes · Redmi Pad 2: No

Why is Redmi Pad 2 better than Galaxy Tab S9 FE+?

Weight627 g vs 510 g+23%
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy Tab S9 FE+: Yes
Pixel density243 ppi vs 274 ppi+13%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+≈ $8308.0	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2≈ $2506.7
Design
Weight	627 g	510 g
Thickness	6.5 mm	7.4 mm
Height	285.4 mm	254.6 mm
Width	185.4 mm	166 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Plastic
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 3	Corning Gorilla Glass 3 or Panda glass
Colours	Mint, Silver, Gray, Lavender	Graphite Gray, Mint Green, Lavender Purple
Display
Screen size	12.4″	11″
Panel	IPS LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	1,600 px	1,600 px
Resolution (long side)	2,560 px	2,560 px
Pixel density	243 ppi	274 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	90 Hz
Peak brightness	800 nits	600 nits
Measured brightness	760 nits	527 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	84.3%	83%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 1380	Mediatek Helio G100 Ultra
Chip maker	Exynos	MediaTek
Process	5 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Mali-G68 MP5	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	765,195	570,469
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,859	1,980
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	10,090 mAh	9,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.2 h
Wired charging	45 W	18 W
Charged in 30 min	38%	17%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	Yes
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26.9 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only)	Accelerometer, gyro/compass (cellular model only)
Cameras
Rear camera	8 MP	8 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/2	f/2
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Front camera	12 MP	5 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 6	HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised	4	—