vs
7.9Display8.1
6.2Performance7.9
8.4Battery7.3
7.0Memory & storage6.1
7.6Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy Tab S9 FE+nubia Pad 3D
| Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ | nubia Pad 3D | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 285.4 mm | 285 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Width | 185.4 mm | 190 mm | −4.6 mm |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm | 8.5 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 627 g | 780 g | −153 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ better than nubia Pad 3D?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · nubia Pad 3D: No
- 5GYes · nubia Pad 3D: No
- Battery capacity10,090 mAh vs 9,070 mAh+11%
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Weight627 g vs 780 g+24%
- eSIMYes · nubia Pad 3D: No
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia Pad 3D: No
- Front camera12 MP vs 8 MP+50%
- Thickness6.5 mm vs 8.5 mm+31%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.3% vs 82.3%+2%
Why is nubia Pad 3D better than Galaxy Tab S9 FE+?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Rear camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+18%
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 627 g | 780 g |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 285.4 mm | 285 mm |
| Width | 185.4 mm | 190 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Mint, Silver, Gray, Lavender | Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12.4″ | 12.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,560 px | 2,560 px |
| Pixel density | 243 ppi | 243 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 760 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.3% | 82.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | 765,195 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,859 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,090 mAh | 9,070 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | — | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side / power button | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12L |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
8.48.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+vsOnePlus Pad
8.07.7
vs
OPPO Pad 5vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
8.08.0
vs
Lenovo Tab K12vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
8.88.0
vs
Honor Pad X9 MaxvsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
7.88.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+vsXiaomi Redmi Pad 2
8.06.7