vs
5.2Display6.6
7.2Performance8.4
9.1Battery9.8
7.6Memory & storage9.6
9.6Features9.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Armor Pad 4 UltraArmor Pad 5 Ultra
| Armor Pad 4 Ultra | Armor Pad 5 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 261.7 mm | 269.7 mm | −8 mm |
| Width | 166.8 mm | 179.5 mm | −12.7 mm |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 27.8 mm | −13.5 mm |
| Weight | 834 g | 1,600 g | −766 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Armor Pad 4 Ultra better than Armor Pad 5 Ultra?
- Weight834 g vs 1,600 g+92%
- Drop resistance classA vs D
- Thickness14.3 mm vs 27.8 mm+94%
- Pixel density225 ppi vs 206 ppi+9%
- Resolution (long side)2,000 px vs 1,920 px+4%
Why is Armor Pad 5 Ultra better than Armor Pad 4 Ultra?
- Battery capacity11,800 mAh vs 24,200 mAh2.1×
- Wired charging33 W vs 120 W3.6×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Screen size10.4″ vs 11″+6%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6E+30%
- Endurance per cycle188 h vs 402 h2.1×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+8%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 834 g | 1,600 g |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm | 27.8 mm |
| Height | 261.7 mm | 269.7 mm |
| Width | 166.8 mm | 179.5 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.4″ | 11″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,000 px | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | 225 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70% | 72.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400X |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 11,800 mAh | 24,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 120 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side / power button | Side / power button |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 188 h | 402 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | D |
Related comparisons
vs
UleFone Armor Pad 4 UltravsXiaomi Pad 7
8.08.2
vs
UleFone Armor Pad 4 UltravsWortmann Terra Pad 1201
vs
UleFone Armor Pad 4 UltravsLenovo Legion Tab
8.07.7
vs
Doogee T30 MaxvsUleFone Armor Pad 4 Ultra
8.18.0
vs
Lenovo Legion Tab G3vsUleFone Armor Pad 5 Ultra
vs
UleFone Armor Pad 5 UltravsOnePlus Pad 3
9.49.4