vs
4.4Memory & storage4.6
Why is Iconia A16 A16-21 better than Pad P3?
- Screen size16″ vs 8.7″+84%
Why is Pad P3 better than Iconia A16 A16-21?
- Weight1,290 g vs 540 g2.4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx84×
- Repairability classC vs B
- Drop resistance classE vs B
- Endurance per cycle25 h vs 35 h+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 1,290 g | 540 g |
| Thickness | — | 14.5 mm |
| Height | 9 mm | 232 mm |
| Width | — | 146 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx8 |
| Colours | — | Black / Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 8.7″ |
| Panel | — | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 1,340 px |
| Pixel density | — | 180 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 63.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek MT | MediaTek Helio |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 7,200 mAh |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
| Dual SIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 16 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | G |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 25 h | 35 h |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | B |
