vs
4.4Memory & storage5.2
Why is Iconia A16 A16-21 better than iPlay 70 Max Pro?
- Screen size16″ vs 13″+23%
Why is iPlay 70 Max Pro better than Iconia A16 A16-21?
- Weight1,290 g vs 684 g+89%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Endurance per cycle25 h vs 145 h5.8×
- Energy classG vs E
- Repairability classC vs B
- Drop resistance classE vs C
- Battery charge cycles800 vs 1,000+25%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 1,290 g | 684 g |
| Thickness | — | 7.1 mm |
| Height | 9 mm | 7 mm |
| Width | — | 193.4 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx2 |
| Colours | — | Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 13″ |
| Panel | — | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 1,600 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 2,560 px |
| Pixel density | — | 232 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 350 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek MT | Unisoc |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 10,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 15 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | E |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 25 h | 145 h |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | C |
