How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
630 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Iconia A16 A16-21 vs MegaPad

Acer Iconia A16 A16-21 vs Cubot MegaPad

What Iconia A16 A16-21 does better (2) and where MegaPad wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Acer Iconia A16 A16-21
Acer · 2026Iconia A16 A16-21
2 advantages≈ $320
vs
Cubot MegaPad
Cubot · 2026MegaPad
6.6Score
2 advantages
Higher score
4.4Memory & storage4.6

Why is Iconia A16 A16-21 better than MegaPad?

  1. Screen size16″ vs 13.4″+20%
  2. Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%

Why is MegaPad better than Iconia A16 A16-21?

  1. Cellular (LTE)No · Iconia A16 A16-21: Yes
  2. Weight1,290 g vs 846 g+52%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight1,290 g846 g
Thickness—8.1 mm
Height9 mm309.3 mm
Width—208 mm
Ingress protectionIP42—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2—
Colours—Gray
Display
Screen size16″13.4″
Panel—IPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)—1,200 px
Resolution (long side)—1,920 px
Pixel density—169 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio—80.4%
Performance
ChipsetMediaTek MTMediatek Helio G81
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process—12 nm
CPU cores—8
CPU frequency—2 GHz
GPU—Mali-G52 MC2
Memory
RAM6 GB6 GB
Storage (max)128 GB128 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Memory card slot—Yes
Battery
Battery capacity—14,700 mAh
Wired charging—18 W
Wireless charging—No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoYes
eSIM—No
Dual SIM—Yes
Wi-Fi standard—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25
USB—USB Type-C 2.0
USB version—2
NFC—No
GPS—Yes
Satellite navigation—GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack—No
Sensors—Accelerometer
Cameras
Rear camera—16 MP
Rear cameras—1
Ultra-wide camera—No
Optical stabilisation—No
Max video—1080p
Front camera—8 MP
4K front-camera video—No
Software
OS at launch—Android 16
Platform—Android
EU label
Energy classG—
Battery charge cycles800—
Endurance per cycle25 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classE—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare