How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
623 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Iconia iM11-22M5G vs A12 Pro

Acer Iconia iM11-22M5G vs UleFone A12 Pro

What Iconia iM11-22M5G does better (3) and where A12 Pro wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Acer Iconia iM11-22M5G
Acer · 2026Iconia iM11-22M5G
6.8Score
3 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
vs
UleFone A12 Pro
UleFone · 2026A12 Pro
6.7Score
1 advantage≈ $270
6.8Display6.9
5.2Memory & storage4.9

Why is Iconia iM11-22M5G better than A12 Pro?

  1. Cellular (LTE)Yes · A12 Pro: No
  2. Weight535 g vs 610 g+14%
  3. Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%

Why is A12 Pro better than Iconia iM11-22M5G?

  1. Screen size11.4″ vs 12.2″+7%
Specifications

Side by side

UleFone A12 ProUleFone A12 Pro≈ $2706.7
Design
Weight535 g610 g
Thickness7.9 mm—
Height261.7 mm8 mm
Width177.7 mm—
FrameAluminium—
BackAluminium—
Ingress protection—IP42
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx2
ColoursSilver—
Display
Screen size11.4″12.2″
PanelIPS LCD—
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,440 px—
Resolution (long side)2,200 px—
Pixel density230 ppi—
Refresh rate90 Hz—
Peak brightness450 nits450 nits
Screen-to-body ratio83.3%—
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7050Unisoc
Chip makerMediaTekUnisoc
Process6 nm—
CPU cores8—
CPU frequency2.6 GHz—
GPUMali-G68 MC4—
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)128 GB128 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—
Memory card slotYes—
Battery
Battery capacity7,400 mAh—
Wired charging18 W—
Wireless chargingNo—
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
5GYes—
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6—
Bluetooth5.25
USBUSB Type-C 2.0—
USB version2—
NFCNo—
GPSYes—
Features
Stylus supportYes—
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5 mm headphone jackYes—
Fingerprint sensorYes—
SensorsFingerprint (top-mounted)—
Cameras
Rear camera16 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Max video1080p—
Front camera8 MP—
4K front-camera videoNo—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15—
PlatformAndroid—
EU label
Energy class—F
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—91 h
Repairability class—B
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare