vs
6.8Display5.1
7.4Performance4.8
4.3Battery7.6
5.2Memory & storage6.1
9.3Features4.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Iconia iM11-22M5GRugKing Pad 2 Pro
| Iconia iM11-22M5G | RugKing Pad 2 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 261.7 mm | 246 mm | +15.7 mm |
| Width | 177.7 mm | 163.5 mm | +14.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 12.7 mm | −4.8 mm |
| Weight | 535 g | 706 g | −171 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Iconia iM11-22M5G better than RugKing Pad 2 Pro?
- 5GYes · RugKing Pad 2 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · RugKing Pad 2 Pro: No
- Pixel density230 ppi vs 149 ppi+54%
- Screen size11.4″ vs 10.1″+13%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+44%
- Weight535 g vs 706 g+32%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Resolution (short side)1,440 px vs 800 px+80%
- Resolution (long side)2,200 px vs 1,280 px+72%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 12.7 mm+61%
- Screen-to-body ratio83.3% vs 73.5%+13%
Why is RugKing Pad 2 Pro better than Iconia iM11-22M5G?
- Battery capacity7,400 mAh vs 10,200 mAh+38%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Rear camera16 MP vs 48 MP3×
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 600 nits+33%
- eSIMNo · Iconia iM11-22M5G: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 535 g | 706 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 12.7 mm |
| Height | 261.7 mm | 246 mm |
| Width | 177.7 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Aluminium | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Silver | Gray, Black, Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11.4″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,440 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,200 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 230 ppi | 149 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.3% | 73.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,400 mAh | 10,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | Side / power button |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (top-mounted) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 16 MP | 48 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | E |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 126 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Iconia iM11-22M5GvsHANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7B
vs
Acer Iconia iM11-22M5GvsInfinix Xpad 30 Pro
6.86.8
vs
Acer Iconia iM11-22M5GvsTCL Tab A1 Plus
6.86.5
vs
Acer Iconia iM11-22M5GvsUleFone Tab A12 Pro
6.86.7
vs
HANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7BvsUleFone RugKing Pad 2 Pro
vs
Infinix Xpad 30 ProvsUleFone RugKing Pad 2 Pro
6.86.5