vs
2.7Memory & storage8.8
Why is Iconia Tab A11-21 better than MatePad 12X 2025?
- Weight500 g vs 555 g+11%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is MatePad 12X 2025 better than Iconia Tab A11-21?
- RAM4 GB vs 12 GB3×
- Screen size10.9″ vs 12″+10%
- Endurance per cycle52 h vs 94 h+81%
- Battery charge cycles800 vs 1,000+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 500 g | 555 g |
| Height | 9 mm | 6 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx2 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.9″ | 12″ |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Pixel density | — | 280 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Allwinner | HiSilicon Kirin |
| Chip maker | Allwinner | HiSilicon |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 256 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | G |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 52 h | 94 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
