Why is Pad P3 better than Lumo 7.8?
- RAM6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Screen size8.7″ vs 7.8″+11%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Repairability classB vs C
- Drop resistance classB vs E
- Pixel density180 ppi vs 164 ppi+10%
- Endurance per cycle35 h vs 29 h+21%
Why is Lumo 7.8 better than Pad P3?
- Weight540 g vs 250 g2.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 540 g | 250 g |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | — |
| Height | 232 mm | 7 mm |
| Width | 146 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black / Orange | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.7″ | 7.8″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,340 px | — |
| Pixel density | 180 ppi | 164 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 63.2% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio | MediaTek Helio |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,200 mAh | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
| Dual SIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | G |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 35 h | 29 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | B | E |
