Why is Pad P3 better than A12 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
- Peak brightness600 nits vs 450 nits+33%
- eSIMYes · A12 Pro: No
- Drop resistance classB vs C
- Weight540 g vs 610 g+13%
Why is A12 Pro better than Pad P3?
- Screen size8.7″ vs 12.2″+41%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Endurance per cycle35 h vs 91 h2.6×
- Energy classG vs F
- Battery charge cycles800 vs 1,000+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 540 g | 610 g |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | — |
| Height | 232 mm | 8 mm |
| Width | 146 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Black / Orange | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.7″ | 12.2″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,340 px | — |
| Pixel density | 180 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 63.2% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio | Unisoc |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,200 mAh | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | F |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 35 h | 91 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | B | C |
