vs
6.0Display7.6
5.2Memory & storage8.0
Why is iPlay 70 Max Pro better than T12 Pro?
- Screen size13″ vs 11.5″+13%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is T12 Pro better than iPlay 70 Max Pro?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Peak brightness350 nits vs 500 nits+43%
- Weight684 g vs 500 g+37%
- Pixel density232 ppi vs 291 ppi+25%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 684 g | 500 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | — |
| Height | 7 mm | 8 mm |
| Width | 193.4 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | Gray | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13″ | 11.5″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,560 px | — |
| Pixel density | 232 ppi | 291 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 350 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc | MediaTek Helio |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 145 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7BvsAlldoCube iPlay 70 Max Pro
vs
Nexall N90vsAlldoCube iPlay 70 Max Pro
vs
Doogee U13 ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 70 Max Pro
7.87.3
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming TabletvsAlldoCube iPlay 70 Max Pro
7.67.3
vs
Tabwee T12 ProvsTabwee T60 Pro
8.27.5
vs
Tabwee T12 ProvsHANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7B