vs
6.0Display5.2
7.7Battery7.5
5.2Memory & storage6.1
Why is iPlay 70 Max Pro better than RugKing Pad 2 Pro?
- 5GYes · RugKing Pad 2 Pro: No
- Wired charging33 W vs 18 W+83%
- Screen size13″ vs 10.1″+29%
- Pixel density232 ppi vs 149 ppi+56%
- Resolution (short side)1,600 px vs 800 px2×
- Resolution (long side)2,560 px vs 1,280 px2×
- Thickness7.1 mm vs 12.7 mm+79%
- Weight684 g vs 706 g+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.9% vs 73.5%+16%
- Endurance per cycle145 h vs 126 h+15%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is RugKing Pad 2 Pro better than iPlay 70 Max Pro?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Cellular (LTE)No · iPlay 70 Max Pro: Yes
- Peak brightness350 nits vs 600 nits+71%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx84×
- eSIMNo · iPlay 70 Max Pro: Yes
- Drop resistance classC vs A
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 684 g | 706 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 12.7 mm |
| Height | 7 mm | 246 mm |
| Width | 193.4 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Gray | Gray, Black, Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,560 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 232 ppi | 149 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 350 nits | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 73.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Process | — | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | 10,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side / power button |
| Sensors | — | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | — | 48 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Front camera | — | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | E |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 145 h | 126 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | C | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Nexall N90vsAlldoCube iPlay 70 Max Pro
vs
AlldoCube iPlay 70 Max ProvsAcer Iconia A16 A16-21
vs
Doogee U13 ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 70 Max Pro
7.87.3
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming TabletvsAlldoCube iPlay 70 Max Pro
7.67.3
vs
AlldoCube iPlay 70 Max ProvsTecno Megapad 2
7.36.9
vs
UleFone RugKing Pad 2 ProvsAcer Iconia A16 A16-21