vs
6.0Display6.3
5.2Memory & storage4.4
Why is iPlay 70 Max Pro better than MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2?
- Weight684 g vs 1,300 g+90%
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Peak brightness350 nits vs 220 nits+59%
- Energy classE vs G
- Repairability classB vs C
- Drop resistance classC vs E
- Endurance per cycle145 h vs 95 h+53%
- Battery charge cycles1,000 vs 800+25%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.1+6%
Why is MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2 better than iPlay 70 Max Pro?
- Screen size13″ vs 13.3″+2%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 684 g | 1,300 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | — |
| Height | 7 mm | 13 mm |
| Width | 193.4 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Gray | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13″ | 13.3″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,560 px | — |
| Pixel density | 232 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 350 nits | 220 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc | ARM Cortex |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | ARM |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | G |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 145 h | 95 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | C | E |
Related comparisons
vs
Nexall N90vsAlldoCube iPlay 70 Max Pro
vs
vs
Doogee U13 ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 70 Max Pro
7.87.3
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Gaming TabletvsAlldoCube iPlay 70 Max Pro
7.67.3
vs
AlldoCube iPlay 70 Max ProvsTecno Megapad 2
7.36.8
vs

