vs
2.4Display4.2
2.2Performance3.5
2.5Memory & storage3.1
2.9Features2.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Fire HD 8 (2022)MatePad C5e
| Fire HD 8 (2022) | MatePad C5e | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 201.9 mm | 240.2 mm | −38.3 mm |
| Width | 137.4 mm | 159 mm | −21.6 mm |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 7.9 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Weight | 337 g | 450 g | −113 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Fire HD 8 (2022) better than MatePad C5e?
- Wired charging15 W vs 10 W+50%
- Weight337 g vs 450 g+34%
Why is MatePad C5e better than Fire HD 8 (2022)?
- RAM2 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Screen size8″ vs 10.1″+26%
- Storage (base)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- GPSNo · Fire HD 8 (2022): Yes
- Pixel density189 ppi vs 224 ppi+19%
- Resolution (short side)800 px vs 1,200 px+50%
- Resolution (long side)1,280 px vs 1,920 px+50%
- CPU cores6 vs 8+33%
- Thickness9.6 mm vs 7.9 mm+22%
- Screen-to-body ratio66.9% vs 77.4%+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 337 g | 450 g |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 201.9 mm | 240.2 mm |
| Width | 137.4 mm | 159 mm |
| Colours | Black, Denim, Rose | Deepsea Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,280 px | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 224 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 66.9% | 77.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8169A | Kirin 710A |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Kirin |
| Process | — | 14 nm |
| CPU cores | 6 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 2EE MC2 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | No | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | EMUI 10.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Amazon Fire HD 8 (2022)vsLenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
3.93.8
vs
Amazon Fire HD 10 (2021)vsAmazon Fire HD 8 (2022)
4.43.9
vs
Amazon Fire HD 8 (2022)vsTCL Tab 8 4G
3.93.6
vs
Amazon Fire HD 8 (2022)vsHonor Pad X8 Lite
3.93.9
vs
Amazon Fire HD 8 (2022)vsTCL Tab 10L
3.93.6
vs
Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020)vsAmazon Fire HD 8 (2022)
3.93.9