vs
5.8Display3.2
5.6Battery4.6
3.6Memory & storage2.8
Why is iPad (2022) better than Core-T5?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · Core-T5: No
- 5GYes · Core-T5: No
- Screen size10.9″ vs 8″+36%
- Battery capacity7,606 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+9%
- Pixel density264 ppi vs 189 ppi+40%
- Weight477 g vs 594 g+25%
- Resolution (short side)1,640 px vs 800 px2×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- eSIMYes · Core-T5: No
- Thickness7 mm vs 13.8 mm+97%
- Resolution (long side)2,360 px vs 1,280 px+84%
Why is Core-T5 better than iPad (2022)?
- Memory card slotNo · iPad (2022): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 477 g | 594 g |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 13.8 mm |
| Height | 248.6 mm | 14 mm |
| Width | 179.5 mm | 135 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Aluminium | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating | Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Silver, Blue, Pink, Yellow | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.9″ | 8″ |
| Panel | Liquid Retina IPS LCD | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,640 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,360 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 264 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 466 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.5% | 60.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Apple A14 Bionic | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Chip maker | Apple | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 6 | — |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | — |
| GPU | Apple GPU | — |
| AnTuTu score | 1,216,748 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,871 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,229 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | NVMe | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,606 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | Yes | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (top-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | — |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 12 MP | — |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Front camera | 12 MP | — |
| 4K front-camera video | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | iPadOS 16.1 | Android |
| Platform | iPadOS | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 154 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPad (2022)vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9+
6.15.8
vs
Apple iPad (2022)vsXiaomi Pad 6
6.17.2
vs
Apple iPad (2022)vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5 (2021)
6.14.5
vs
Apple iPad (2022)vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9
6.14.8
vs
Apple iPad (2022)vsXiaomi Redmi Pad SE
6.16.1
vs
Apple iPad (2022)vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
6.17.2