vs
5.8Display4.5
6.8Performance4.9
5.5Battery5.4
3.6Memory & storage3.8
7.7Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
iPad (2022)Moto Tab G70
| iPad (2022) | Moto Tab G70 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 248.6 mm | 258.4 mm | −9.8 mm |
| Width | 179.5 mm | 163 mm | +16.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 7.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 477 g | 500 g | −23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iPad (2022) better than Moto Tab G70?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Wired charging30 W vs 20 W+50%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+46%
- Process5 nm vs 12 nm2.4×
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 400 nits+25%
- Pixel density264 ppi vs 212 ppi+25%
- eSIMYes · Moto Tab G70: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Weight477 g vs 500 g+5%
- Front camera12 MP vs 8 MP+50%
- Resolution (short side)1,640 px vs 1,200 px+37%
Why is Moto Tab G70 better than iPad (2022)?
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- Memory card slotNo · iPad (2022): Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · iPad (2022): Yes
- CPU cores6 vs 8+33%
- Rear camera12 MP vs 13 MP+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 477 g | 500 g |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 248.6 mm | 258.4 mm |
| Width | 179.5 mm | 163 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating | — |
| Colours | Silver, Blue, Pink, Yellow | Modernist Teal, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.9″ | 11″ |
| Panel | Liquid Retina IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,640 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,360 px | 2,000 px |
| Pixel density | 264 ppi | 212 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | 466 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.5% | 81.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Apple A14 Bionic | Mediatek MT6785 Helio G90T |
| Chip maker | Apple | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 6 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Apple GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,216,748 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,871 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,229 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | NVMe | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,606 mAh | 7,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 20 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | Yes | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS | GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (top-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 12 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | iPadOS 16.1 | Android 11 |
| Platform | iPadOS | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPad (2022)vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9+
6.15.8
vs
Apple iPad (2022)vsXiaomi Pad 6
6.17.2
vs
Apple iPad (2022)vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5 (2021)
6.14.5
vs
Apple iPad (2022)vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9
6.14.8
vs
Apple iPad (2022)vsXiaomi Redmi Pad SE
6.16.1
vs
Apple iPad (2022)vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
6.17.2