vs
5.2Display4.6
6.6Performance6.6
9.2Battery9.3
7.6Memory & storage7.6
8.8Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Active 8 ProTab KingKong 2
| Active 8 Pro | Tab KingKong 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 256.3 mm | 273.8 mm | −17.5 mm |
| Width | 165.8 mm | 181.4 mm | −15.6 mm |
| Thickness | 16.8 mm | 16.8 mm | = |
| Weight | 976 g | 1,055 g | −79 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Active 8 Pro better than Tab KingKong 2?
- Battery capacity22,000 mAh vs 20,400 mAh+8%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Tab KingKong 2: No
- Pixel density225 ppi vs 207 ppi+9%
- Weight976 g vs 1,055 g+8%
- Resolution (long side)2,000 px vs 1,920 px+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio71.9% vs 70%+3%
Why is Tab KingKong 2 better than Active 8 Pro?
- Screen size10.4″ vs 11″+6%
- Front camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Energy classG vs F
- Battery charge cycles800 vs 1,200+50%
- Rear camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Endurance per cycle153 h vs 167 h+9%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 976 g | 1,055 g |
| Thickness | 16.8 mm | 16.8 mm |
| Height | 256.3 mm | 273.8 mm |
| Width | 165.8 mm | 181.4 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Panda Glass |
| Colours | Black, Orange | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.4″ | 11″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,000 px | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | 225 ppi | 207 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 71.9% | 70% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 22,000 mAh | 20,400 mAh |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | F |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | 153 h | 167 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Blackview Active 8 ProvsVivo Pad Air
7.87.9
vs
Blackview Active 10 ProvsBlackview Active 8 Pro
8.97.8
vs
Blackview Active 12 ProvsBlackview Active 8 Pro
9.07.8
vs
Blackview Active 8 ProvsOukitel OT5
7.87.6
vs
Blackview Active 8 ProvsUleFone Armor Pad 2
7.88.1
vs
Blackview Active 8 ProvsDoogee T20 Ultra
7.87.6