vs
5.2Display4.2
6.6Performance5.4
9.2Battery9.1
7.6Memory & storage5.2
8.8Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Active 8 ProSpider 8
| Active 8 Pro | Spider 8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 256.3 mm | 251.3 mm | +5 mm |
| Width | 165.8 mm | 170.1 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Thickness | 16.8 mm | 14.9 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Weight | 976 g | 854 g | +122 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Active 8 Pro better than Spider 8?
- Battery capacity22,000 mAh vs 13,000 mAh+69%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear camera48 MP vs 13 MP3.7×
- Screen size10.4″ vs 10.1″+3%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Spider 8: No
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Resolution (long side)2,000 px vs 1,920 px+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio71.9% vs 69.2%+4%
Why is Spider 8 better than Active 8 Pro?
- Weight976 g vs 854 g+14%
- Thickness16.8 mm vs 14.9 mm+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 976 g | 854 g |
| Thickness | 16.8 mm | 14.9 mm |
| Height | 256.3 mm | 251.3 mm |
| Width | 165.8 mm | 170.1 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Orange | Black, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.4″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,000 px | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | 225 ppi | 224 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 71.9% | 69.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Unisoc Tiger T616 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 22,000 mAh | 13,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | — | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 48 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | DokeOS 3.0 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 153 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Blackview Active 8 ProvsVivo Pad Air
7.87.9
vs
Blackview Active 10 ProvsBlackview Active 8 Pro
8.97.8
vs
Blackview Active 12 ProvsBlackview Active 8 Pro
9.07.8
vs
Blackview Active 8 ProvsOukitel OT5
7.87.6
vs
Blackview Active 8 ProvsUleFone Armor Pad 2
7.88.1
vs
Blackview Active 8 ProvsDoogee T20 Ultra
7.87.6