vs
5.2Display6.0
4.5Performance5.1
4.8Battery3.9
6.1Memory & storage5.5
5.7Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Tab 11 SEGalaxy Tab A9+
| Tab 11 SE | Galaxy Tab A9+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 249 mm | 257.1 mm | −8.1 mm |
| Width | 156.7 mm | 168.7 mm | −12 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 6.9 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 512 g | 480 g | +32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Tab 11 SE better than Galaxy Tab A9+?
- Battery capacity7,680 mAh vs 7,040 mAh+9%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Pixel density225 ppi vs 206 ppi+9%
- Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Front camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
- Resolution (long side)2,000 px vs 1,920 px+4%
Why is Galaxy Tab A9+ better than Tab 11 SE?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- 5GNo · Tab 11 SE: Yes
- Screen size10.4″ vs 11″+6%
- CPU frequency1.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+38%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- eSIMNo · Tab 11 SE: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Tab 11 SE: Yes
- Weight512 g vs 480 g+7%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 6.9 mm+17%
- Screen-to-body ratio78.3% vs 80.9%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 512 g | 480 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 6.9 mm |
| Height | 249 mm | 257.1 mm |
| Width | 156.7 mm | 168.7 mm |
| Colours | Blue, Gray, Silver | Graphite, Silver, Navy |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.4″ | 11″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,000 px | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | 225 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 456 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 78.3% | 80.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 582,451 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,072 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,680 mAh | 7,040 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8 |
Related comparisons
vs
Blackview Tab 11 SEvsXiaomi Redmi Pad SE
6.06.1
vs
Blackview Tab 11 SEvsOnePlus Pad Go
6.06.4
vs
Blackview Tab 11 SEvsUmidigi A15 Tab
6.06.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsXiaomi Redmi Pad SE
5.86.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsXiaomi Pad 6
5.87.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9
5.84.8