vs
3.3Display6.0
4.4Performance5.1
3.0Battery3.9
4.8Memory & storage5.5
3.8Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy Tab A9Galaxy Tab A9+
| Galaxy Tab A9 | Galaxy Tab A9+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 211 mm | 257.1 mm | −46.1 mm |
| Width | 124.7 mm | 168.7 mm | −44 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 6.9 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 332 g | 480 g | −148 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy Tab A9 better than Galaxy Tab A9+?
- Weight332 g vs 480 g+45%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
Why is Galaxy Tab A9+ better than Galaxy Tab A9?
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 7,040 mAh+38%
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GNo · Galaxy Tab A9: Yes
- AnTuTu score508,554 vs 582,451+15%
- Screen size8.7″ vs 11″+26%
- Front camera2 MP vs 5 MP2.5×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,943 vs 2,072+7%
- eSIMNo · Galaxy Tab A9: Yes
- Pixel density179 ppi vs 206 ppi+15%
- Resolution (short side)800 px vs 1,200 px+50%
- Resolution (long side)1,340 px vs 1,920 px+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 332 g | 480 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 6.9 mm |
| Height | 211 mm | 257.1 mm |
| Width | 124.7 mm | 168.7 mm |
| Colours | Graphite, Silver, Navy | Graphite, Silver, Navy |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.7″ | 11″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,340 px | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | 179 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 460 nits | 456 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.7% | 80.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 508,554 | 582,451 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,943 | 2,072 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 7,040 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8 | One UI 8 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsXiaomi Pad 6
4.87.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsXiaomi Redmi Pad SE
4.86.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
4.87.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9
5.24.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9
4.88.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5 (2021)
4.84.5