vs
4.1Display2.4
4.3Performance2.7
4.3Battery3.3
4.6Memory & storage4.1
5.7Features3.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Tab 13Tab 50 WiFi
| Tab 13 | Tab 50 WiFi | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 238.8 mm | 211.2 mm | +27.6 mm |
| Width | 157.6 mm | 126.2 mm | +31.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 9.7 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 450 g | 355 g | +95 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Tab 13 better than Tab 50 WiFi?
- Battery capacity7,280 mAh vs 5,580 mAh+30%
- RAM6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · Tab 50 WiFi: No
- Screen size10.1″ vs 8″+26%
- Rear camera13 MP vs 2 MP6.5×
- Front camera8 MP vs 0.3 MP26.7×
- CPU cores8 vs 42×
- GPSYes · Tab 50 WiFi: No
- Pixel density224 ppi vs 189 ppi+19%
- Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 800 px+50%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 1,280 px+50%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 9.7 mm+26%
Why is Tab 50 WiFi better than Tab 13?
- Weight450 g vs 355 g+27%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Tab 13: Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 450 g | 355 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 9.7 mm |
| Height | 238.8 mm | 211.2 mm |
| Width | 157.6 mm | 126.2 mm |
| Colours | Twilight Blue, Space Gray, Silver | Twilight Blue, Space Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 224 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 78.6% | 69.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 | Rockchip RK3562 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | — |
| Process | 12 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 4 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 @820 MHz |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,280 mAh | 5,580 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 2 MP |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 0.3 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | D |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 89 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | C |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPad (2022)vsBlackview Tab 13
6.15.4
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsXiaomi Redmi Pad
5.45.1
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2022)
5.45.2
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsLenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen)
5.45.2
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsRealme Pad X
5.45.8
vs
Apple iPad mini (2021)vsBlackview Tab 13
5.75.4