Dimensions
Size comparison
Tab 13Redmi Pad
| Tab 13 | Redmi Pad | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 238.8 mm | 250.5 mm | −11.7 mm |
| Width | 157.6 mm | 158.1 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.1 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 450 g | 465 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Tab 13 better than Redmi Pad?
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · Redmi Pad: No
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- GPSYes · Redmi Pad: No
- Weight450 g vs 465 g+3%
- Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
Why is Redmi Pad better than Tab 13?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Battery capacity7,280 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+10%
- Screen size10.1″ vs 10.6″+5%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 7.1 mm+8%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 2,000 px+4%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio78.6% vs 80.9%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 450 g | 465 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.1 mm |
| Height | 238.8 mm | 250.5 mm |
| Width | 157.6 mm | 158.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Colours | Twilight Blue, Space Gray, Silver | Graphite Gray, Moonlight Silver, Mint Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 10.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 2,000 px |
| Pixel density | 224 ppi | 220 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 402 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 78.6% | 80.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 319,077 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,852 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,280 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -23.9 LUFS |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 14 |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPad (2022)vsBlackview Tab 13
6.15.4
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2022)
5.45.2
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsLenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen)
5.45.3
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsRealme Pad X
5.45.9
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsHonor Pad 8
5.45.3
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsSamsung Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro
5.45.9