Dimensions
Size comparison
Tab 13Pad 8
| Tab 13 | Pad 8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 238.8 mm | 278.5 mm | −39.7 mm |
| Width | 157.6 mm | 174.1 mm | −16.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 6.9 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 450 g | 520 g | −70 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Tab 13 better than Pad 8?
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · Pad 8: No
- Rear camera13 MP vs 5 MP2.6×
- Memory card slotYes · Pad 8: No
- GPSYes · Pad 8: No
- Weight450 g vs 520 g+16%
- Pixel density224 ppi vs 194 ppi+15%
- Front camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
Why is Pad 8 better than Tab 13?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Screen size10.1″ vs 12″+19%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+20%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 6.9 mm+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio78.6% vs 84.5%+8%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 2,000 px+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 450 g | 520 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 6.9 mm |
| Height | 238.8 mm | 278.5 mm |
| Width | 157.6 mm | 174.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Colours | Twilight Blue, Space Gray, Silver | Dark Blue, Gold, Mint |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 12″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 2,000 px |
| Pixel density | 224 ppi | 194 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 350 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 392 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 78.6% | 84.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 279,242 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,545 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,280 mAh | 7,250 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 22 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | — | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -22.7 LUFS |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Magic UI 6.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPad (2022)vsBlackview Tab 13
6.15.4
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsXiaomi Redmi Pad
5.45.1
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2022)
5.45.2
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsLenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen)
5.45.3
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsRealme Pad X
5.45.9
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsSamsung Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro
5.45.9