vs
4.1Display4.5
4.3Performance5.0
4.3Battery5.4
4.6Memory & storage3.8
5.7Features7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Tab 13Moto Tab G70
| Tab 13 | Moto Tab G70 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 238.8 mm | 258.4 mm | −19.6 mm |
| Width | 157.6 mm | 163 mm | −5.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 450 g | 500 g | −50 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Tab 13 better than Moto Tab G70?
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Weight450 g vs 500 g+11%
- Pixel density224 ppi vs 212 ppi+6%
Why is Moto Tab G70 better than Tab 13?
- Battery capacity7,280 mAh vs 7,700 mAh+6%
- Screen size10.1″ vs 11″+9%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Tab 13: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+2%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 2,000 px+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio78.6% vs 81.8%+4%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 7.5 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 450 g | 500 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 238.8 mm | 258.4 mm |
| Width | 157.6 mm | 163 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Twilight Blue, Space Gray, Silver | Modernist Teal, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 11″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 2,000 px |
| Pixel density | 224 ppi | 212 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 78.6% | 81.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 | Mediatek MT6785 Helio G90T |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,280 mAh | 7,700 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 20 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPad (2022)vsBlackview Tab 13
6.15.4
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsXiaomi Redmi Pad
5.45.1
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2022)
5.45.2
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsLenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen)
5.45.2
vs
Blackview Tab 13vsRealme Pad X
5.45.8
vs
Apple iPad mini (2021)vsBlackview Tab 13
5.75.4