vs
5.0Display3.0
5.4Performance4.3
5.0Battery4.1
7.6Memory & storage6.5
6.4Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Tab 16 ProR08
| Tab 16 Pro | R08 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 256.8 mm | 249.5 mm | +7.3 mm |
| Width | 167 mm | 167.8 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 13.5 mm | −6 mm |
| Weight | 503 g | 716 g | −213 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Tab 16 Pro better than R08?
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Wired charging18 W vs 10 W+80%
- Screen size11″ vs 10.1″+9%
- Weight503 g vs 716 g+42%
- Pixel density206 ppi vs 149 ppi+38%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 13.5 mm+80%
- Front camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
- Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 800 px+50%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 1,280 px+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.8% vs 70.7%+16%
Why is R08 better than Tab 16 Pro?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Tab 16 Pro: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 503 g | 716 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 13.5 mm |
| Height | 256.8 mm | 249.5 mm |
| Width | 167 mm | 167.8 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Gray, Blue, Violet | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 149 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.8% | 70.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 | Mediatek MT8788 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,700 mAh | 7,680 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side / power button |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 98 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPad mini (2024)vsBlackview Tab 16 Pro
6.66.3
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsInfinix Xpad
6.36.2
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsWortmann Terra Pad 1201
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsSamsung Galaxy Tab Active5
6.36.0
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsLenovo Tab Plus
6.36.5
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsOPPO Pad Neo
6.36.2