vs
5.0Display3.9
5.4Performance4.7
5.0Battery5.6
7.6Memory & storage5.5
6.4Features3.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Tab 16 ProMatePad SE 11
| Tab 16 Pro | MatePad SE 11 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 256.8 mm | 252.3 mm | +4.5 mm |
| Width | 167 mm | 163.8 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 6.9 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 503 g | 475 g | +28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Tab 16 Pro better than MatePad SE 11?
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · MatePad SE 11: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- GPSYes · MatePad SE 11: No
- Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Front camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
Why is MatePad SE 11 better than Tab 16 Pro?
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+40%
- Wired charging18 W vs 22 W+25%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Tab 16 Pro: Yes
- Weight503 g vs 475 g+6%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 6.9 mm+9%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.8% vs 84.9%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 503 g | 475 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 6.9 mm |
| Height | 256.8 mm | 252.3 mm |
| Width | 167 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Colours | Gray, Blue, Violet | Nebula Gray, Crystal Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 11″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 447 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.8% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno |
| AnTuTu score | — | 461,236 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,489 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,700 mAh | 7,700 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 22 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | — | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | HarmonyOS 2.0 |
| Platform | Android | HarmonyOS |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 98 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPad mini (2024)vsBlackview Tab 16 Pro
6.66.3
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsInfinix Xpad
6.36.2
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsWortmann Terra Pad 1201
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsSamsung Galaxy Tab Active5
6.36.0
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsLenovo Tab Plus
6.36.5
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsOPPO Pad Neo
6.36.2