vs
5.0Display2.7
5.4Performance3.6
5.0Battery8.0
7.6Memory & storage6.5
6.4Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Tab 16 ProRT9
| Tab 16 Pro | RT9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 256.8 mm | 251.2 mm | +5.6 mm |
| Width | 167 mm | 170 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 14.2 mm | −6.7 mm |
| Weight | 503 g | 850 g | −347 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Tab 16 Pro better than RT9?
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Weight503 g vs 850 g+69%
- Screen size11″ vs 10.1″+9%
- Pixel density206 ppi vs 149 ppi+38%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz+25%
- Repairability classB vs C
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 14.2 mm+89%
- Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 800 px+50%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 1,280 px+50%
- Battery charge cycles1,200 vs 1,000+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.8% vs 69.3%+18%
Why is RT9 better than Tab 16 Pro?
- Battery capacity7,700 mAh vs 11,000 mAh+43%
- Endurance per cycle98 h vs 302 h3.1×
- Front camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Energy classE vs B
- Drop resistance classB vs A
- Rear camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 503 g | 850 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 14.2 mm |
| Height | 256.8 mm | 251.2 mm |
| Width | 167 mm | 170 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Gray, Blue, Violet | Black, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 149 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.8% | 69.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 | Unisoc T606 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,700 mAh | 11,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 98 h | 302 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | B | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPad mini (2024)vsBlackview Tab 16 Pro
6.66.3
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsInfinix Xpad
6.36.2
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsWortmann Terra Pad 1201
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsSamsung Galaxy Tab Active5
6.36.0
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsLenovo Tab Plus
6.36.5
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsOPPO Pad Neo
6.36.2