vs
4.9Display3.3
5.4Performance5.4
5.0Battery4.5
7.6Memory & storage5.2
5.7Features9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Tab 16 ProArmor Pad Pro
| Tab 16 Pro | Armor Pad Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 256.8 mm | 213 mm | +43.8 mm |
| Width | 167 mm | 128.8 mm | +38.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 14 mm | −6.5 mm |
| Weight | 503 g | 560 g | −57 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Tab 16 Pro better than Armor Pad Pro?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size11″ vs 8″+38%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Energy classE vs F
- Repairability classB vs C
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 14 mm+87%
- Weight503 g vs 560 g+11%
- Pixel density206 ppi vs 189 ppi+9%
- Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 800 px+50%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 1,280 px+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.8% vs 67.6%+21%
- Battery charge cycles1,200 vs 1,000+20%
Why is Armor Pad Pro better than Tab 16 Pro?
- Rear camera13 MP vs 48 MP3.7×
- Front camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Tab 16 Pro: Yes
- Drop resistance classB vs A
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 503 g | 560 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 256.8 mm | 213 mm |
| Width | 167 mm | 128.8 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Gray, Blue, Violet | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.8% | 67.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 | Mediatek MT8788 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,700 mAh | 7,650 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side / power button |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 48 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | F |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 98 h | 84 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | B | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPad mini (2024)vsBlackview Tab 16 Pro
6.66.2
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsWortmann Terra Pad 1201
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsSamsung Galaxy Tab Active5
6.26.0
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsLenovo Tab Plus
6.26.5
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsOPPO Pad Neo
6.26.2
vs
Blackview Tab 60 ProvsBlackview Tab 16 Pro
5.86.2