vs
5.0Display3.0
5.4Performance6.6
5.0Battery3.6
7.6Memory & storage5.2
6.4Features6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Tab 16 ProG3 Tab Ultra
| Tab 16 Pro | G3 Tab Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 256.8 mm | 244.8 mm | +12 mm |
| Width | 167 mm | 162.2 mm | +4.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 9.3 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Weight | 503 g | 482 g | +21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Tab 16 Pro better than G3 Tab Ultra?
- Battery capacity7,700 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+28%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size11″ vs 10.1″+9%
- Pixel density206 ppi vs 149 ppi+38%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 720p
- Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 800 px+50%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 1,280 px+50%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 9.3 mm+24%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.8% vs 74.5%+10%
Why is G3 Tab Ultra better than Tab 16 Pro?
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Tab 16 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Weight503 g vs 482 g+4%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 503 g | 482 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 9.3 mm |
| Height | 256.8 mm | 244.8 mm |
| Width | 167 mm | 162.2 mm |
| Colours | Gray, Blue, Violet | Space Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 149 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.8% | 74.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,700 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 720p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 98 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPad mini (2024)vsBlackview Tab 16 Pro
6.66.3
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsInfinix Xpad
6.36.2
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsWortmann Terra Pad 1201
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsSamsung Galaxy Tab Active5
6.36.0
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsLenovo Tab Plus
6.36.5
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsOPPO Pad Neo
6.36.2