How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Tab 16 Pro vs Poco Pad

Blackview Tab 16 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco Pad

What Tab 16 Pro does better (4) and where Poco Pad wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Blackview Tab 16 Pro
Blackview · 2024Tab 16 Pro
6.3Score
4 advantages
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad
Xiaomi · 2024Poco Pad
7.3Score
12 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
5.0Display7.6
5.4Performance5.8
5.0Battery6.0
7.6Memory & storage7.6
6.4Features6.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Tab 16 ProPoco Pad
167 × 256.87.5181.9 × 2807.5
Tab 16 ProPoco PadDifference
Height256.8 mm280 mm−23.2 mm
Width167 mm181.9 mm−14.9 mm
Thickness7.5 mm7.5 mm=
Weight503 g571 g−68 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Tab 16 Pro better than Poco Pad?

  1. Cellular (LTE)Yes · Poco Pad: No
  2. GPSYes · Poco Pad: No
  3. Weight503 g vs 571 g+14%
  4. Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%

Why is Poco Pad better than Tab 16 Pro?

  1. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
  2. Battery capacity7,700 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+30%
  3. Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
  4. Process12 nm vs 4 nm3×
  5. Screen size11″ vs 12.1″+10%
  6. Pixel density206 ppi vs 249 ppi+21%
  7. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Tab 16 Pro: Yes
  8. CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+20%
  9. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
  10. Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 1,600 px+33%
  11. Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 2,560 px+33%
  12. Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Poco PadXiaomi Poco Pad≈ $3007.3
Design
Weight503 g571 g
Thickness7.5 mm7.5 mm
Height256.8 mm280 mm
Width167 mm181.9 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Aluminium
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 3
ColoursGray, Blue, VioletDark Gray, Blue
Display
Screen size11″12.1″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,200 px1,600 px
Resolution (long side)1,920 px2,560 px
Pixel density206 ppi249 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—600 nits
Measured brightness—564 nits
Screen-to-body ratio81.8%83.4%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T616Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Chip makerUnisocQualcomm
Process12 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2 GHz2.4 GHz
GPUMali-G57 MP1Adreno 710
AnTuTu score—600,399
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—2,909
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—793
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory card slotYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity7,700 mAh10,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—9.2 h
Wired charging18 W33 W
Charged in 30 min—29%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
5G—Yes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth55.2
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
USB version—2
NFCNoNo
GPSYesNo
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS—
Features
Stylus support—Yes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-23.9 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP8 MP
Rear camera aperture—f/2
Rear cameras21
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Front camera8 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS
EU label
Energy classE—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle98 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classB—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare